• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • SINTEF
  • SINTEF akademisk forlag
  • COIN Project report
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • SINTEF
  • SINTEF akademisk forlag
  • COIN Project report
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Practical methods to assess segregation risk of SCC on site. FA: Competitive constructions SP 2.1 Robust and highly flowable concrete with controlled surface quality

Martius-Hammer, Tor Arne; Kjellmark, Gunrid; Smeplass, Sverre; De Weerdt, Klaartje
Research report
Published version
Thumbnail
View/Open
Practical methods to assess segregation risk of SCC on site (6.480Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2576834
Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • COIN Project report [76]
  • Rapporter fra SINTEF Community [690]
  • SINTEF Community [2037]
Abstract
Many of the suggested methods for testing of SCC stability are quite demanding in execution and therefore seldom used in field. Furthermore, questions have been raised about how well they represent the stability problems in situ. The aim of the present investigation was therefore to find a method to assess stability of SCC which is practical, reliable and representative for in situ stability problems. This was done by a large scale test where the stability assessed according to four selected methods was compared with the stability assessed in low wall elements (10 m long) where the SCC was cast from one end, by measuring the distribution of the coarse aggregate content.

Two mixes of the same concrete were tested in order to see the comparison for both stable and unstable concretes. The one was known to give sufficient stability for wall casting, and the other one added more water reducing admixture to give rather poor stability. The results showed a good agreement between three of the methods and between these methods and the stability assessed by measuring the coarse aggregate distribution in the walls. One of these methods is a simple visual based assessment of the residue after the slump flow test.
Publisher
SINTEF Building and Infrastructure
Series
COIN Project report;59
Copyright
© 2015 SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit