Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEinarsson, Haraldur Arnar
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Zhaohai
dc.contributor.authorBayse, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Bent
dc.contributor.authorWinger, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T11:35:16Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T11:35:16Z
dc.date.created2020-10-12T12:55:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.identifier.citationAquaculture and Fisheries. 2020, 1-11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-550X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3142147
dc.description.abstractThe size selectivity and usability of three codends were quantified and compared for the first time in the inshore Northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) trawl fishery of Iceland using the covered codend method: a conventional diamond-mesh codend (T0), conventional square-mesh codend (T45), and a 90° turned mesh codend (T90) constructed of four panels and with shortened lastridge ropes. Fishers, wanting to increase the average-individual size of captured shrimp, had requested the T90 codend to be compared with conventional codends for consideration in the fishery. Results showed that, on average, the T45 and T90 codends had better size selectivity than the T0 codend in terms of releasing individuals smaller than 13 mm carapace length (Minimum References Size; MRS). The T90 codend retained significantly less Northern shrimps between 9 and 19 mm than the T0 codend and between 15 and 19 mm than the T45 codend. No significant difference of size selectivity between T45 and T0 codends was observed. All three codends presented high retention ratios of Northern shrimps above MRS (>63%) for the population encountered. However, the T0 codend was not effective at sorting out small Northern shrimps; at least 86% of Northern shrimps smaller than 13 mm were retained in the T0 codend if encountered. Catches from T45 and T90 codends had a lower proportion of shrimp below MRS. Since discarding of undersized Northern shrimps is prohibited in Iceland and fishers wanted to catch on average larger shrimp, using the novel T90 codend would enable fishers to use their quotas more efficiently.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectSize selectivityen_US
dc.subjectCodend usabilityen_US
dc.subjectPandalus borealisen_US
dc.subjectDiamond-meshen_US
dc.subjectT45en_US
dc.subjectT90en_US
dc.subjectIcelanden_US
dc.subjectLastridge ropeen_US
dc.titleComparing the size selectivity of a novel T90 mesh codend to two conventional codends in the northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) trawl fisheryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Shanghai Ocean University. Published by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.journalAquaculture and Fisheriesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aaf.2020.09.005
dc.identifier.cristin1838858
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal