Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, David A.
dc.contributor.authorRathbone, James
dc.contributor.authorAkin-Akinyosoye, Kehinde
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Gwen
dc.contributor.authorValdes, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorF. McWilliams, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Weiya
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Michael
dc.contributor.authorE. Hancox, Jennie
dc.contributor.authorVedhara, Kavita
dc.contributor.authorNair, Roshan das
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Eamonn
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T12:57:20Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T12:57:20Z
dc.date.created2023-02-28T11:11:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open. 2023, 5 (2), 100345.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2665-9131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3136589
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Guidelines recommend knee osteoarthritis pain management based on biopsychosocial mechanisms. Treatment adherence and effectiveness may be affected if there is a mismatch between patient perspectives and treatment focus. We therefore examined patient perspectives on mechanisms of their knee pain, why it persisted or changed over the past year, whether their understanding had changed, and whether their understanding aligned with that of others with whom they interact. Methods: Individuals with chronic knee pain (n ​= ​50) were purposively recruited from the Knee Pain and related health In the Community (KPIC) cohort to represent worsened, improved, or unchanged pain or anxiety between baseline and one year later. Framework analysis, a comparative form of thematic analysis, was used across transcripts of semi-structured telephone interviews. Results: Data were collapsed into themes of diagnosis, joint structure, ageing, physical activity, weight management, and treatment. Participants focused on biomechanical rather than psychological pain mechanisms. Some participants attributed pain improvement to increased and others to decreased physical activity. Participants reported no change in their understanding of their pain during the preceding year, but that their attitudes to pain, for example acceptance, had changed. Participants reported that they and others around them lacked understanding of their pain and why it did or did not change. Conclusion: People report a predominantly biomechanical understanding of why their knee pain remains constant or changes over time. Clinicians should support patients to develop a biopsychosocial understanding of knee pain aligned to treatment across the range of biological, psychological, and social modalities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHow people with knee pain understand why their pain changes or remains the same over time: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI).en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume5en_US
dc.source.journalOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Openen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100345
dc.identifier.cristin2129999
dc.source.articlenumber100345en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal