Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaliousis, Michael
dc.contributor.authorRennoldson, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDawson, David
dc.contributor.authordas Nair, Roshan
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T11:24:10Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T11:24:10Z
dc.date.created2023-06-13T13:09:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2023, 65, 102359.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-3889
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3136551
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an intensive procedure associated with elevated psychological distress, particularly during the initial stages. Based on self-regulatory theory, a prophylactic group intervention was developed to mitigate this distress by targeting perceptions of HSCT and coping. This study evaluated the feasibility of delivering the intervention and of conducting a randomised clinical trial to assess efficacy. Methods: Adults from consecutive referrals at two transplant centres were randomised to the intervention or to treatment as usual at each site. Psychological distress (primary outcome), HSCT perceptions, and coping were assessed at baseline, on transplant day, and two and four weeks after transplantation. Results: Of 99 eligible patients, 45 consented. Main barriers to consent were insufficient time prior to transplantation, competing priorities, being unwell, and travel distance. Of 21 participants randomised to the intervention, five attended. Main barriers to attendance included insufficient time prior to transplantation and having competing priorities. Groups could not be held sufficiently frequently to enable attendance prior to transplantation, as randomising participants to the control group limited accrual. Anxiety peaked two weeks following transplantation. Depression increased throughout the acute phase. Clinical levels of distress were observed in 42% of patients during HSCT. Intervention effects were small but sample sizes for a full trial appeared feasible. Conclusions: Multimodal prehabilitation is required but there are specific barriers to delivering a group-based intervention and conducting a trial. Group prehabilitation requires customisation and better integration with routine care, such as patient screening, personalisation, and options for remote delivery.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleGroup psychological intervention for emotional distress in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A feasibility randomised clinical trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.volume65en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Oncology Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102359
dc.identifier.cristin2154119
dc.source.articlenumber102359en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal