Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCowan, Emily Christine
dc.contributor.authorSetsaas, Lacie
dc.contributor.authorNørstebø, Vibeke Stærkebye
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T12:03:14Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T12:03:14Z
dc.date.created2023-08-03T09:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 2023, 13, 545-556.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2190-6483
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3129484
dc.description.abstractPlastic pollution is a growing global concern. Although the pollution itself is transboundary and knows no borders—the accumulation of plastics can have a more detrimental impact depending on where it is. In this study, we focus on the Arctic, an area where fragile ecosystems are increasingly under pressure from human-made products such as plastics. Although plastic pollution takes place on a global scale, it will be up to the regional and local levels to implement solutions that work in practice. In light of this, we held a participatory stakeholder workshop in the town of Longyearbyen on Svalbard to identify local perceptions from sectors directly affected by and affecting plastic use and growing mitigation efforts on Svalbard. This was followed by a dialogue on best practices and roadblocks to shift towards a circular economy (CE) in the Arctic. We used a qualitative approach facilitating our workshop by building a group model with stakeholders in various sectors living and working in the Arctic coupled with semi-structured interviews that gain a more detailed understanding of the opportunities and pitfalls of the model. Our main goal was to better understand how the currently negotiated treaty to end plastic pollution may be better implemented at the national and local levels, starting with input from a smaller Arctic community heavily impacted by plastic pollution. In the end, participants stated a strong desire for top-down guidance to make it easier to implement changes at the local levels. Moreover, like that of the ongoing treaty negotiations, the importance of having the same definitions for a CE and its components was deemed vital to enact positive change.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEnd of life at the top of the world—stakeholder perspectives for plastics and circular transitions in the Arcticen_US
dc.title.alternativeEnd of life at the top of the world—stakeholder perspectives for plastics and circular transitions in the Arcticen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Springer Nature.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber545-556en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Environmental Studies and Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13412-023-00845-6
dc.identifier.cristin2164611
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 315402en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 318730en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal