Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGullbrekken, Lars
dc.contributor.authorGransjøen, Therese
dc.contributor.authorAndenæs, Erlend
dc.contributor.authorTime, Berit
dc.contributor.authorKvande, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T06:56:51Z
dc.date.available2023-12-20T06:56:51Z
dc.date.created2023-12-15T10:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS). 2023, 2654 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1742-6588
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3108284
dc.description.abstractWindows are important in buildings intended for human activities as they let in daylight and provide views. However, they may also be vulnerable in terms of heat loss, air leaks, rain tightness, and durability. In Nordic climates featuring severe driving rain exposure, water tightness is of outmost importance. SINTEF has for many decades been testing windows as part of the Norwegian yearly product control. Air permeability and water tightness are tested according to NS-EN 1026 and NS-EN 1027, respectively. The windows are then classified as described in NS-EN 12207 and NS-EN 12208. This paper summarises experiences from the last two decades of testing, presenting the results of 1130 tests of windows' air permeability and rain tightness. The overall trend is that air and rain tightness performance of the windows have improved over time. Certain hinge configurations are clearly better than others, with tilt and turn windows performing the best and top hung casement windows the poorest. There is a clear trend that highly rainproof windows also exhibit lower air permeability. Multiple-window screens fail the test more often since they feature longer perimeters of opening. The contribution of weather sweep seals to the water tightness is significant as it makes an extra rain barrier to the joint between casement and frame. In general, leakage between the frames of double windows and in the joints of the frame occurs at lower air pressures than leakages between casement and frame. The lessons learned from the survey may guide future development of weatherproof windows.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRain resistance of windows – Lessons learned from two decades of laboratory testingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US
dc.source.volume2654en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1742-6596/2654/1/012140
dc.identifier.cristin2214029
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 237859en_US
dc.source.articlenumber012140en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal