Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLindstad, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorAlterskjær, Sverre Anders
dc.contributor.authorSandaas, Inge
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Astrid Vamråk
dc.contributor.authorVigsnes, Joakim Tveiten
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-15T09:34:46Z
dc.date.available2023-09-15T09:34:46Z
dc.date.created2023-05-01T15:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationTransactions - Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. 2017, 125 39-56.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-7923-1228-1
dc.identifier.issn0081-1661
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3089684
dc.descriptionPostprint version of published articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe development of Open hatch carriers (OHC) dates back to the early 1960s linked to transport of newsprint from the paper mills along the coast of British Columbia (Canada) to the news-printers in San Francisco and Los Angles (USA). Prior to that, conventional general cargo ships, tween-deck liners and trampers transported newsprint and lumber (timber). The present OHC fleet transport a wide range of commodities in addition to the initial newsprint, i.e. timber (lumber), fertilizer (both as bulk and in bags), minor bulk, containers, project cargoes and even road units on multi decks. This implies that the present OHC fleet are competing with dry bulkers for typical dry bulk cargoes, and with container vessels and Ro-Ro's for cargo types, which requires more careful handling. The paper presents an overview of the historic development of transport efficiencies from the steam ships used in newsprint and timber trades in the early 1900 up to the latest generation of OHC's. Followed by a parametric feasibility study focusing on identifying cost and improvement potentials for new alternative designs versus the present. The results indicates that alternative combinations of main measurements to enable lower block coefficients reduces fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) per freight unit transported. Moreover, these designs might increase the competitiveness of Open Hatch vessels versus their competitors, i.e. dry-bulk, container and Ro-Ro.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSociety of Naval Architects and Marine Engineersen_US
dc.titleOpen Hatch Carriers – Future Vessel Designs & Operationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeOpen Hatch Carriers – Future Vessel Designs & Operationsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber39-56en_US
dc.source.volume125en_US
dc.source.journalTransactions - Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineersen_US
dc.identifier.cristin2144551
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 237917en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel