Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowers, Katie
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Julie
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Jain A.
dc.contributor.authorCripps, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorCraven, Kristelle
dc.contributor.authorFarrin, Amanda
dc.contributor.authorNair, Roshan das
dc.contributor.authorRadford, Kathryn A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T15:09:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T15:09:24Z
dc.date.created2022-11-07T12:43:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2022, 8, 234.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053403
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite growing numbers of studies reporting the efficacy of complex interventions and their implementation, many studies fail to report information on implementation fidelity or describe how fidelity measures used within the study were developed. This study aimed to develop a fidelity checklist for measuring the implementation fidelity of an early, stroke-specialist vocational rehabilitation intervention (ESSVR) in the RETAKE trial. Methods: To develop the fidelity measure, previous checklists were reviewed to inform the assessment structure, and core intervention components were extracted from intervention descriptions into a checklist, which was ratified by eight experts in fidelity measurement and complex interventions. Guidance notes were generated to assist with checklist completion. To test the measure, two researchers independently applied the checklist to fifteen stroke survivor intervention case notes using retrospective observational case review. The scoring was assessed for interrater reliability. Results: A fidelity checklist containing 21 core components and 6 desirable components across 4 stages of intervention delivery was developed with corresponding guidance notes. Interrater reliability of each checklist item ranged from moderate to perfect (Cohen’s kappa 0.69–1). Conclusions: The resulting checklist to assess implementation fidelity is fit for assessing the delivery of vocational rehabilitation for stroke survivors using retrospective observational case review. The checklist proved its utility as a measure of fidelity and may be used to inform the design of future implementation strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDeveloping an implementation fidelity checklist for a vocational rehabilitation interventionen_US
dc.title.alternativeDeveloping an implementation fidelity checklist for a vocational rehabilitation interventionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Pilot and Feasibility Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40814-022-01194-x
dc.identifier.cristin2069940
dc.source.articlenumber234en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal