Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPruvost, Florian
dc.contributor.authorCloete, Schalk Willem Petrus
dc.contributor.authorArnaiz del Pozo, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorZaabout, Abdelghafour
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T11:50:23Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T11:50:23Z
dc.date.created2022-12-07T10:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Conversion and Management. 2022, 274 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3037234
dc.description.abstractRising climate change ambitions require large-scale clean hydrogen production in the near term. “Blue” hydrogen from conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) with pre-combustion CO2 capture can fulfil this role. This study therefore presents techno-economic assessments of a range of SMR process configurations to minimize hydrogen production costs. Results showed that pre-combustion capture can avoid up to 80% of CO2 emissions cheaply at 35 €/ton, but the final 20% of CO2 capture is much more expensive at a marginal CO2 avoidance cost around 150 €/ton. Thus, post-combustion CO2 capture should be a better solution for avoiding the final 20% of CO2. Furthermore, an advanced heat integration scheme that recovers most of the steam condensation enthalpy before the CO2 capture unit can reduce hydrogen production costs by about 6%. Two hybrid hydrogen production options were also assessed. First, a “blue-green” hydrogen plant that uses clean electricity to heat the reformer achieved similar hydrogen production costs to the pure blue configuration. Second, a “blue-turquoise” configuration that replaces the pre-reformer with molten salt pyrolysis for converting higher hydrocarbons to a pure carbon product can significantly reduce costs if carbon has a similar value to hydrogen. In conclusion, conventional pre-combustion CO2 capture from SMR is confirmed as a good solution for kickstarting the hydrogen economy, and it can be tailored to various market conditions with respect to CO2, electricity, and pure carbon prices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectTechno-economic assessmenten_US
dc.subjectMethane pyrolysisen_US
dc.subjectCO2 captureen_US
dc.subjectSteam methane reformingen_US
dc.subjectHydrogen productionen_US
dc.titleBlue, green, and turquoise pathways for minimizing hydrogen production costs from steam methane reforming with CO2 captureen_US
dc.title.alternativeBlue, green, and turquoise pathways for minimizing hydrogen production costs from steam methane reforming with CO2 captureen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume274en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Conversion and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116458
dc.identifier.cristin2089925
dc.source.articlenumber116458en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal