Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBarahmand, Zahir
dc.contributor.authorJayarathna, Chameera
dc.contributor.authorRatnayake, Chandana
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T09:54:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-23T09:54:40Z
dc.date.created2022-11-22T17:54:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedings. 2022, 185 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1650-3686
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3033574
dc.description.abstractAs in many real applications, in the world of fine powders and small particles, there are uncertainties and vagueness in the parameters such as particle size, sphericity, initial solid void fraction, envelope density, etc. In some cases, there are different methods to measure a parameter, such as a particle size that depends on the method (based on length, weight, and volume); the measured values may be significantly different from each other. Therefore, there is no crisp or exactly known parameter in many cases because of the fine powders' inherent uncertain nature. On the other hand, being characteristic of the dynamic systems, physical parameters such as temperature and pressure fluctuate but can be kept in an acceptable range, affecting the main design parameters such as fluid density and dynamic viscosity. The most traditional tools and methods for simulating, modeling, and reasoning are crisp, deterministic, and precise, but these values are estimated or changing (randomly or stochastically). Several approaches can describe this phenomenon. Moreover, when it comes to uncertainties, mathematical tools are probably the best solutions. With the fuzzy set theory method, linguistic variables or ranges can be converted to mathematical expressions, and consequently, instead of crisp values, these can be applied to the equations. The uncertainty analysis can be more important when the model is susceptible to one parameter. A preliminary sensitivity analysis on a fluidized bed application has shown that the solid void fraction has the highest, and the fluid density has the lowest sensitivity to its operation. The theoretical approach has been validated by CPFD simulation using Barracuda v20.1.0.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherScandinavian Simulation Societyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCPFD simulationen_US
dc.subjectcirculating fluidized bed reactoren_US
dc.subjectuncertainty analysisen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity analysisen_US
dc.subjectfuzzy set theoryen_US
dc.titleSensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor Modelingen_US
dc.title.alternativeSensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor Modelingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2022 Zahir Barahmand, Chameera Jayarathna, Chandana Ratnayakeen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US
dc.source.volume185en_US
dc.source.journalLinköping Electronic Conference Proceedingsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3384/ecp21185350
dc.identifier.cristin2078651
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal