Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorManni, Mattia
dc.contributor.authorFailla, Maria Chiara
dc.contributor.authorNocente, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorLobaccaro, Gabriele
dc.contributor.authorJelle, Bjørn Petter
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-17T07:29:39Z
dc.date.available2022-11-17T07:29:39Z
dc.date.created2022-11-07T17:14:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSolar Energy. 2022, 248 76-87.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0038-092X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032286
dc.description.abstractSolar energy’s penetration at high latitudes has been boosted during recent years, but snow deposits during the winter still limit its exploitation. Therefore, various solutions for snow removal, such as icephobic coatings, increasing panels’ tilt angle, and using wind flows, are being attempted to reduce snow and ice accumulation. The novelty of this study is that it presents insights into the snow-related issues of photovoltaic plants in Norway and proposes a preliminary approach to modelling these issues’ influences at high latitudes using a co-simulation approach. The workflow is based on a combination of PVsyst and Marion’s algorithm, and moves from the assessment of snow deposits on photovoltaic panels and the consequent reduction of plane of array (POA) irradiance (snow losses) to evaluating the influence of icephobic nanomaterials on snow losses. Solar analyses are performed on a photovoltaic plant located in Trondheim, Norway, and then reiterated considering the climate of the Norwegian cities of Bergen and Oslo. The snow losses between November and April, when the snow depth is greater than zero, are 32.75 kWh/m2 in Oslo, 25.05 kWh/m2 in Trondheim, and 5.85 kWh/m2 in Bergen. The application of icephobic coatings currently available on the market will reduce such snow losses to 12.05 kWh/m2 (65% efficiency) in Oslo, 10.00 kWh/m2 (60% efficiency) in Trondheim, and 3.35 kWh/m2 (45% efficiency) in Bergen. In conclusion, the application of icephobic coatings should be more greatly boosted in a continental climate (Oslo and Trondheim) than in an oceanic climate (Bergen) to maximize photovoltaic power output.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectIcephobicen_US
dc.subjectNanomaterialen_US
dc.subjectSnow lossen_US
dc.subjectBuilding-integrated photovoltaicsen_US
dc.subjectSolar cellen_US
dc.titleThe Influence of Icephobic Nanomaterial Coatings on Solar Cell Panels at High Latitudesen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Influence of Icephobic Nanomaterial Coatings on Solar Cell Panels at High Latitudesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.pagenumber76-87en_US
dc.source.volume248en_US
dc.source.journalSolar Energyen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.005
dc.identifier.cristin2070215
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 244031en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 324243en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0