Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndresen, Inger
dc.contributor.authorTrulsrud, Tonje Healey
dc.contributor.authorFinocchiaro, Luca
dc.contributor.authorNocente, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorTamm, Meril
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz, Joana
dc.contributor.authorSalom, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorMagyari, Ábel
dc.contributor.authorOeffelen, Linda Hoes-van
dc.contributor.authorBorsboom, Wouter
dc.contributor.authorKornaat, Wim
dc.contributor.authorGaitani, Niki
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-13T15:19:46Z
dc.date.available2022-09-13T15:19:46Z
dc.date.created2022-09-09T13:20:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3017591
dc.description.abstractThe article presents the design of four plus energy neighbourhood demonstration projects located in different climate zones in Europe. The demo projects are a part of the Horizon 2020 project ‘syn.ikia’, which aims to enable the development of sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods in different climates and contexts. In this article, we describe the active and passive building strategies and analyse the robustness of the designs with respect to different scenarios of climate change, user behaviour, and energy flexibility. Analyses were performed based on the primary energy balance, including space heating and cooling, ventilation, domestic hot water, and lighting. The performance predictions indicate that all demonstration projects may attain the plus energy balance according to the syn.ikia definition. This was achieved with high performing envelopes, efficient HVAC systems, and onsite renewable energy systems to cover the energy demand. The analysis shows that there is a significant potential for increased self-consumption of photovoltaic energy by adjusting the heating schedules and including electric vehicle charging. Testing of the designs with respect to varying climates and user-behaviours showed that there could be an increased risk of overheating, and that some of the designs may not achieve the positive energy balance in case of ‘worst case’ user behaviour scenarios.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectIntegrated energy designen_US
dc.subjectEnergy performance predictionen_US
dc.subjectPlus energy buildingsen_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectRenewable energy generationen_US
dc.subjectEnergy flexibilityen_US
dc.subjectIndoor environmental qualityen_US
dc.subjectPlus energy neighbourhoodsen_US
dc.subjectPositive energy districtsen_US
dc.titleDesign and performance predictions of plus energy neighbourhoods – Case studies of demonstration projects in four different European climatesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.volume274en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy and Buildingsen_US
dc.identifier.cristin2050312
dc.relation.projectEU – Horisont Europa (EC/HEU): 869918en_US
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
dc.source.articlenumber112447en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/