Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRingvej Dahl, Iben
dc.contributor.authorTveiten, Bård Wathne
dc.contributor.authorCowan, Emily Christine
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-08T09:37:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-08T09:37:25Z
dc.date.created2022-03-07T09:31:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergies. 2022, 15 (4), 1-14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3016546
dc.description.abstractOffshore wind (OSW) has the potential to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and halt damaging climate change. However, policies to foster an OSW industry in Norway have long been small and scarce. Recent events suggest that this is changing, as the state-owned enterprise Enova decided to grant a record NOK 2.3 bn to build the world’s largest floating offshore wind farm in 2019, the Hywind Tampen project. Based on previous work by the corresponding author, we summarize the political development of OSW in Norway to distil generalisable lessons. The corresponding author employed interviews, document analysis and process tracing, using a theory of policy change to characterise the observed political change. She found that the main obstacle for early OSW deployment has been that environmental and visibility concerns have exacerbated energy–political ones that are created by a longstanding lack of local energy demands. As the green energy demand on a global scale is soaring, the lack of OSW deployment for exports implies that climate–political objectives have been subordinated to energy–political ones, in the formulation of Norwegian OSW policies. This hierarchy of goals was not deemed to have changed, despite the recent political developments in the policy area of Norwegian OSW. Hence, the Norwegian case demonstrates the role of context and national sectoral policies in deciding the pace of sustainable energy transitions. It is suggested that future research considers how policy best practices for renewable energy deployment could be adjusted across varying national contexts to overcome political hurdles to the sustainable transition.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectvested interestsen_US
dc.subjectpolicy changeen_US
dc.subjectpolicy paradigmsen_US
dc.subjectenergy transitionen_US
dc.subjectsustainable transitionen_US
dc.subjectrenewable energyen_US
dc.subjectoffshore winden_US
dc.titleThe Case for Policy in Developing Offshore Wind: Lessons from Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Case for Policy in Developing Offshore Wind: Lessons from Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-14en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en15041569
dc.identifier.cristin2007919
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal