Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Margallo, Juan A.
dc.contributor.authorTas, Lisette
dc.contributor.authorMoelker, Adriaan
dc.contributor.authorvan den Dobbelsteen, John J.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
dc.contributor.authorLangø, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorvan Walsum, Theo
dc.contributor.authorvan de Berg, Nick J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-26T11:47:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-26T11:47:09Z
dc.date.created2021-12-06T09:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMedical Physics (Lancaster). 2021, 48 (12), 7602-7612.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3013782
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To present a novel methodical approach to compare visibility of percutaneous needles in ultrasound images. Methods: A motor-driven rotation platform was used to gradually change the needle angle while capturing image data. Data analysis was automated using block-matching-based registration, with a tracking and refinement step. Every 25 frames, a Hough transform was used to improve needle alignments after large rotations. The method was demonstrated by comparing three commercial needles (14G radiofrequency ablation, RFA; 18G Trocar; 22G Chiba) and six prototype needles with different sizes, materials, and surface conditions (polished, sand-blasted, and kerfed), within polyvinyl alcohol phantom tissue and ex vivo bovine liver models. For each needle and angle, a contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was determined to quantify visibility. CNR values are presented as a function of needle type and insertion angle. In addition, the normalized area under the (CNR-angle) curve was used as a summary metric to compare needles. Results: In phantom tissue, the first kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility and the polished 1 mm diameter stainless steel needle the smallest (0.704 ± 0.199 vs. 0.154 ± 0.027, p < 0.01). In the ex vivo model, the second kerfed needle design had the largest normalized area of visibility, and the sand-blasted stainless steel needle the smallest (0.470 ± 0.190 vs. 0.127 ± 0.047, p < 0.001). As expected, the analysis showed needle visibility peaks at orthogonal insertion angles. For acute or obtuse angles, needle visibility was similar or reduced. Overall, the variability in needle visibility was considerably higher in livers. Conclusion: The best overall visibility was found with kerfed needles and the commercial RFA needle. The presented methodical approach to quantify ultrasound visibility allows comparisons of (echogenic) needles, as well as other technological innovations aiming to improve ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles, such as coatings, material treatments, and beam steering approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM)en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBlock-matching-based registrationen_US
dc.subjectBovine liver modelen_US
dc.subjectContrast-to-noise ratioen_US
dc.subjectExperimental methodsen_US
dc.subjectHough transformen_US
dc.subjectNeedle interventionsen_US
dc.subjectPolyvinyl alcoholen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectVisibilityen_US
dc.titleBlock-matching-based registration to evaluate ultrasound visibility of percutaneous needles in liver-mimicking phantomsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber7602-7612en_US
dc.source.volume48en_US
dc.source.journalMedical Physics (Lancaster)en_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mp.15305
dc.identifier.cristin1964888
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal