Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaase, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorBaer, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T18:13:43Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T18:13:43Z
dc.date.created2022-05-09T10:19:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1613-0073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995322
dc.description.abstractReaching for the Global Sustainability Goals, urban areas play a crucial role, as they are identified as the main area for global emissions. Cities do play a prominent role to put global goals into local policies and means and at the same time embedding it in local context with site specific demands and settings. The Positive Energy District (PED) concept is currently evolving based on the Strategic Energy Transition (SET) plan of the European Union member states and contributions from different initiatives. As the first PEDs are developing all over Europe, we have little knowledge on how the PED concept is implemented nationally and how first PED projects develop within the specific national contexts. We ask: What are the concepts and approaches towards PED developments in Switzerland and Norway? What are the implementation strategies and how are functional issues addressed? By looking at different recent developments of PEDs in Switzerland and Norway, we describe the characteristics of national approaches towards PEDs. By deepening the description of two respective case studies in the two countries, we analyzed how PED approaches are implemented within the specific context. We compare the PED concepts, local implementation and functional issues to analyze the approaches. Our research is based on literature and document analysis and qualitative interviews. The results show that different implementation concepts require different measures. From the analysis of the results, the conclusions are that integrated energy planning is more important than ever. Understanding the different dimensions of sustainable development in combination with energy supply and consumption is important to plan and realize settlements that not only contribute significantly to reducing energy consumption and securing the location of energy infrastructure (generation, distribution, storage), but also in terms of long-term sustainable development and specifically climate neutrality. shows/highlight the importance of integrated and cross-sector approaches of PEDs that are implemented and operated in multi-stakeholder settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCEURen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCEUR Workshop Proceedings
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPositive energy districtsen_US
dc.subjectCountry comparisonen_US
dc.titleA case study analysis of Positive Energy District concepts between Switzerland and Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativeA case study analysis of Positive Energy District concepts between Switzerland and Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeConference objecten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.journalCEUR Workshop Proceedingsen_US
dc.identifier.cristin2022574
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257660en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0