Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHeimark, Sondre
dc.contributor.authorRindal, Ole Marius Hoel
dc.contributor.authorSeeberg, Trine Margrethe
dc.contributor.authorStepanov, Alexey
dc.contributor.authorBoysen, Elin Sundby
dc.contributor.authorBøtker-Rasmussen, Kasper
dc.contributor.authorKnudsen Mobæk, Nina
dc.contributor.authorSøraas, Camilla Lund
dc.contributor.authorStenehjem, Aud Eldrid
dc.contributor.authorFadl El Mula, Fadl El Mula Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorWaldum-Grevbo, Bård
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T08:36:13Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T08:36:13Z
dc.date.created2021-12-22T16:48:24Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBlood Pressure Monitoring. 2021, 27, (2), 139-146.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1359-5237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995202
dc.description.abstractObjective: Pulse arrival time (PAT) is a potential main feature in cuff-less blood pressure (BP) monitoring. However, the precise relationship between BP parameters and PAT under varying conditions lacks a complete understanding. We hypothesize that simple test protocols fail to demonstrate the complex relationship between PAT and both SBP and DBP. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the correlation between PAT and BP during two exercise modalities with differing BP responses using an unobtrusive wearable device. Methods: Seventy-five subjects, of which 43.7% had a prior diagnosis of hypertension, participated in an isometric and dynamic exercise test also including seated periods of rest prior to, in between and after. PAT was measured using a prototype wearable chest belt with a one-channel electrocardiogram and a photo-plethysmography sensor. Reference BP was measured auscultatory. Results: Mean individual correlation between PAT and SBP was −0.82 ± 0.14 in the full protocol, −0.79 ± 0.27 during isometric exercise and −0.77 ± 0.19 during dynamic exercise. Corresponding correlation between PAT and DBP was 0.25 ± 0.35, −0.74 ± 0.23 and 0.39 ± 0.41. Conclusion: The results confirm PAT as a potential main feature to track changes in SBP. The relationship between DBP and PAT varied between exercise modalities, with the sign of the correlation changing from negative to positive between type of exercise modality. Thus, we hypothesize that simple test protocols fail to demonstrate the complex relationship between PAT and BP with emphasis on DBP.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Inc.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBlood pressure monitoringen_US
dc.subjectPulse wave analysisen_US
dc.subjectWearable electronic devicesen_US
dc.titleBlood pressure altering method affects correlation with pulse arrival timeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber139-146en_US
dc.source.volume27en_US
dc.source.journalBlood Pressure Monitoringen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MBP.0000000000000577
dc.identifier.cristin1971593
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal