Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrockmann, Gerrid
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Anne
dc.contributor.authorKriegel, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-31T17:57:51Z
dc.date.available2022-01-31T17:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1728-2
dc.identifier.issn2387-4295
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2976123
dc.description.abstractThis investigation analyze the correlation between two common methods to assess the ventilation effectiveness: An averaged contamination removal effectiveness (CRE) value based on the residual lifetime and the air change efficiency (ACE) to better understand their relationship to then give a recommendation for the IAQ-assessment of ventilation designs. The present numerical investigation puts focus on a simple mixing ventilation scenario with different conditions: air change rate, specific heat flux, supply air diffuser and exhaust position. Statistically, the results show a significant correlation. A detailed consideration, especially for the partial load range, will be necessary to for a valide determination of removing airborne contamination
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Press
dc.relation.ispartofHealthy Buildings 2021 – Europe. Proceedings of the 17th International Healthy Buildings Conference 21–23 June 2021
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSINTEF Proceedings;9
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleIs the air change efficiency sufficient to assess the removal of airborne contamination in mixing ventilation?
dc.typeChapter
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeConference object
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Published by SINTEF Academic Press.
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0