Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLyu, Hongmei
dc.contributor.authorSchlegel, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorRzehak, Roland
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Dirk
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T19:18:47Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T19:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1684-1
dc.identifier.issn2387-4295
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2720837
dc.description.abstractThe standard Euler-Euler modelling is based on the phase-averaged method and the forces of the bubble are the function of gas volume fraction. However, the closure models for the forces are developed based on the measured bubble trajectory and the assumption that the forces act on bubble center. This inconsistency can lead to a nonphysical gas concentration in the center or in the near wall region of a pipe if the bubble diameter is larger than the mesh size. In addition, mesh independent solutions may not exist in these cases. In the present contribution, particle-center-averaged method is used in the average of the parameters for the disperse phase and the forces for bubble is changed to act on the bubble center. In this approach, the number density of the bubble centers is one of the solution variables. The gas volume fraction can be calculated from the number density by a diffusion-based method, which is much easier to implement in the CFD codes using the unstructured grids like OpenFOAM. A physically motivated model for the wall-contact force is introduced to ensure that the bubble centers cannot come arbitrarily close to walls. The remedy of the issues with the conventional phaseaveraged two-fluid model is demonstrated using a simplified two-dimensional test case. Furthermore, a comparison is made for pipe flow cases where experimental data are available. The results show that the particle-center-averaged method can help to decrease the over-prediction of the peaks in the gas volume fraction profiles and obtain the mesh independent solutions in the Euler-Euler modelling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartof14th International Conference on CFD in 6 Oil & Gas, Metallurgical and Process Industries SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, October 12–14, 2020
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSINTEF Proceedings;6
dc.rightsCC BY*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectParticle-center-averageen_US
dc.subjectNumber densityen_US
dc.subjectBubble dimensionen_US
dc.subjectDiffusion equationen_US
dc.subjectDeformation force modelen_US
dc.subjectEquation of motionen_US
dc.titleIMPROVEMENT OF EULER-EULER SIMULATION OF TWO-PHASE FLOW BY PARTICLE-CENTER-AVERAGED METHODen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authors. Published by SINTEF Academic Press.en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY