Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGardarsdottir, Stefania Osk
dc.contributor.authorde Lena, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorRomano, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorRoussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.authorVoldsund, Mari
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Calvo, José-Francisco
dc.contributor.authorBerstad, David Olsson
dc.contributor.authorFu, Chao
dc.contributor.authorAnantharaman, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorSutter, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGazzani, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorMazzotti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorCinti, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T17:10:50Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T17:10:50Z
dc.date.created2019-02-11T11:00:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585097
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerationsnb_NO
dc.description.abstractComparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysisnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherMDPInb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume12nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergiesnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en12030542
dc.identifier.cristin1675756
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/641185nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7548,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameGassteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal