Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkaugen, Geir
dc.contributor.authorRoussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Jana Poplsteinova
dc.contributor.authorBrunsvold, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-06T12:24:10Z
dc.date.available2017-07-06T12:24:10Z
dc.date.created2016-09-26T13:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016, 54 (2), 627-639.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2448080
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a detailed technical and economic assessment of conditioning and transporting 13.1 MTPA CO2 with impurities in an on-shore pipe-line over a distance of 500 km. The impurities that are included in the study represents 5 mol% residuals from air-components (N2 and O2) and 10 mol% residuals from natural gas components (N2 and CH4). The analysis includes compression from low pressure, after the captures process, to the pipeline conditions in the dense phase of 150 bar. In the technical analysis of the pipeline transport, thermo-physical properties depending of the pressure and temperature locally as the stream evolves through the pipeline are used as well as heat transferred with the surroundings. The case studies investigate different pipeline diameters from 18″ to 28″ to find the most economical pipeline diameter for each impurity level. The cost model includes the material, labour and energy costs and the result are dependent on the number of required, booster stations, the pipeline wall thickness, the energy consumption and cooling demand. The wall thicknesses are chosen for each investigated diameter based on strength design and rounded off to the next available standard wall thickness according to the API-standard. In the second part, a 24″ pipeline with 4 booster stations is selected and the feed flow rate has been adjusted to match the installed compression power. The results show that for the cost-optimal diameter the specific conditioning and transport cost increases by 13 and 22% for the two cases compared to transporting pure CO2. This represents an increase from 2.3 to 3.8 €/tonCO2. The second scenario, where impure CO2 is transported in an existing pipeline, the cost is shown to be around 20–40% more expensive than transporting pure CO2. The effect on energy consumption and cost from different ambient conditions are also discussed and it is shown that for the selected case the cost of transport will vary 0.01 €/ton/K with change in average temperature from 15 °C as the baseline. Impurities can also be expected to have a significant impact on the technical and economic performances of the whole CCS chain and it is therefore important to evaluate this on a case-to-case bases in order to find possible trade-offs between capture, conditioning, transport and storage and to provide recommendations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTechno-economic evaluation of the effects of impurities on conditioning and transport of CO2 by pipelinenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holderAuthors have copyright to preprint Version.nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber627-639nb_NO
dc.source.volume54nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.025
dc.identifier.cristin1385674
dc.relation.projectEU/308809nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7548,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameGassteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal