Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJayawickrama, Thamali R.
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Nils Erland L
dc.contributor.authorUmeki, Kentaro
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T12:23:00Z
dc.date.available2024-06-03T12:23:00Z
dc.date.created2024-05-14T07:47:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3132277
dc.description.abstractChar conversion is a complex phenomenon that involves not only heterogeneous reactions but also external and internal heat and mass transfer. Reactor-scale simulations often use a point-particle approach (PP approach) as sub-models for char conversion because of its low computational cost. Despite a number of simplifications involved in the PP approach, there are very few studies that systematically investigate the inaccuracies of the PP approach. This study aims to compare and identify when and why the PP approach deviates from resolved-particle simulations (RP approach). Simulations have been carried out for CO2 gasification of a char particle under zone II conditions (i.e., pore diffusion control) using both PP and RP approaches. Results showed significant deviations between the two approaches for the effectiveness factor, gas compositions, particle temperature, and particle diameter. The most significant sources of inaccuracies in the PP approach are negligence of the non-uniform temperature inside the particle and the inability to accurately model external heat transfer. Under the conditions with low effectiveness factors, the errors of intra-particle processes were dominant while the errors of external processes became dominant when effectiveness factors were close to unity. Because it assumes uniform internal temperature, the models applying the PP approach always predict higher effectiveness factors than the RP approach, despite its accurate estimation of intra-particle mass diffusion effects. As a consequence, the PP approach failed to predict the particle size changes accurately. Meanwhile, no conventional term for external heat transfer could explain the inaccuracy, indicating the importance of other sources of errors such as 2D/3D asymmetry or penetration of external flows inside the particles. © 2024 The Author(s) Author keywords Char gasification; Particle-resolved simulation; Point-particle method; Stefan flowen_US
dc.description.abstractOn the inaccuracies of point-particle approach for char conversion modelingen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleOn the inaccuracies of point-particle approach for char conversion modelingen_US
dc.title.alternativeOn the inaccuracies of point-particle approach for char conversion modelingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe Authorsen_US
dc.source.volume370en_US
dc.source.journalFuelen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131743
dc.identifier.cristin2268261
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 267916en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/764697en_US
dc.source.articlenumber131743en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal