Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWiebe, Kirsten Svenja
dc.contributor.authorNørstebø, Vibeke Stærkebye
dc.contributor.authorRocha Aponte, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorSilva Simas, Moana
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Tina
dc.contributor.authorValdes, Gerardo Alfredo Perez
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T11:42:45Z
dc.date.available2024-01-15T11:42:45Z
dc.date.created2023-04-25T10:03:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCircular Economy and Sustainability. 2023, 3, 1-33.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2730-597X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111515
dc.description.abstractA more circular economy aims to reduce global material consumption, make the most out of our resources, and create a more sustainable economic system. In this paper, we analyze how different circular economy actions in Norway affect indicators in the three pillars of sustainable development: economic prosperity (measured by value added), social equity (measured by employment opportunities), and environmental protection (measured by greenhouse gas emissions). Based on priorities of the EU’s Circular Economy Action Plan and characteristics of the Norwegian economy, we have selected five value chains for analysis: electronics; textiles; construction and building; packaging and plastics; and metal efficiency. The results show that there is a substantial potential for increased value added and employment in Norway related to the circular transition, while at the same time mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. For increased material efficiency (plastic packaging, metals), employment gains can be substantial, while imports of metals and plastics decrease, resulting in lower upstream emissions, but higher Norwegian emissions. For consumer goods (textiles, electronics), the positive effects come about from shifting from a buy-and-discard model to a buy-repair/share/use longer model, resulting in increased employment in Norway and decreased imports, which potentially leads to lower emissions, but also lower employment globally. For re-use/re-purpose and recycling of building materials, emission-intense material extraction and processing activities are replaced by more labour intense activities, but has the largest potential of decreasing emissions within Norway.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectScenarioanalyseen_US
dc.subjectScenarioanalyseen_US
dc.subjectTrippelbunnlinjeen_US
dc.subjectTriple bottom lineen_US
dc.subjectSirkulær økonomien_US
dc.subjectCircular economyen_US
dc.subjectInput-Output analyseen_US
dc.subjectInput-Output Analysisen_US
dc.titleCircular Economy and the triple bottom line in Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativeCircular Economy and the triple bottom line in Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). Published by Springer.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Economics: 212en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-33en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalCircular Economy and Sustainabilityen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s43615-021-00138-6
dc.identifier.cristin2143109
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal