Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVevelstad, Solrun Johanne
dc.contributor.authorGrimstvedt, Andreas Magnar
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorKnuutila, Hanna K
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Geir
dc.contributor.authorWiig, Merete
dc.contributor.authorVernstad, Kai
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T14:37:33Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T14:37:33Z
dc.date.created2022-12-20T08:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2022, 62 (1), 610-626.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-5885
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3044401
dc.description.abstractAqueous amine solvents are used to capture CO2 from various flue gas sources. In this work, the chemical stability of a blend of 3-amino-1-propanol (3A1P) and 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine [1-(2HE)PRLD] was studied. The chemical stability tests were conducted both in batch and cycled systems using various oxygen and NOx concentrations, additives (iron), and temperatures. In the thermal degradation experiments with CO2 present, the blend was more stable than the primary amines [(3A1P or monoethanolamine (MEA)] but less stable than the tertiary amine 1-(2HE)PRLD alone. Similar stability was observed between MEA, 3A1P, and the blend in the batch experiments at medium oxygen concentration (21% O2) and no iron present. 1-(2HE)PRLD was more stable. However, the presence of high oxygen concentration (96% O2) and iron reduced the stability of 1-(2HE)PRLD significantly. Furthermore, in the case of the blend, the chemical stability increased with increasing promoter concentration in batch experiments. During the cyclic experiment, the amine loss for the blend was similar to what was previously observed for MEA (30 wt %) under the same conditions. A thorough mapping of degradation compounds in the solvent and condensate samples resulted in the identification and quantification of 30 degradation compounds. The major components in batch and cycled experiments varied somewhat, as expected. In the cyclic experiments, the major components were ammonia, 3-(methylamino)-1-propanol (methyl-AP), N,N′-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)-urea (AP-urea), pyrrolidine, formic acid (formate), and N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-glycine (HPGly). Finally, in this paper, formation pathways for the eight degradation compounds (1,3-oxazinan-2-one, AP-urea, 3-[(3-aminopropyl)amino]-1-propanol, tetrahydro-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-2(1H)-pyrimidinone, methyl-AP, N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-formamide, N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-β-alanine, and HPGly) are suggested.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectSolventsen_US
dc.subjectIronen_US
dc.subjectDegradationen_US
dc.subjectAminesen_US
dc.subjectAldehydesen_US
dc.titleChemical Stability and Characterization of Degradation Products of Blends of 1-(2-Hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine and 3-Amino-1-propanolen_US
dc.title.alternativeChemical Stability and Characterization of Degradation Products of Blends of 1-(2-Hydroxyethyl)pyrrolidine and 3-Amino-1-propanolen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Societyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber610-626en_US
dc.source.volume62en_US
dc.source.journalIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Researchen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03068
dc.identifier.cristin2095490
dc.relation.projectEU/299662en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/884266en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/FP7/608555en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal