Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAngga, I Gusti Agung Gede
dc.contributor.authorBellout, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Brage Strand
dc.contributor.authorBergmo, Per Eirik Strand
dc.contributor.authorSlotte, Per Arne
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Carl Fredrik
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-09T09:38:59Z
dc.date.available2023-01-09T09:38:59Z
dc.date.created2022-11-15T14:16:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSN Applied Sciences. 2022, 4, 26.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2523-3963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041830
dc.description.abstractTackling emissions from hydrocarbon production is a necessity because hydrocarbon production will last for a prolonged time. As a popular hydrocarbon production method, waterflooding operation is energy-intensive and accounts for significant CO2 emissions. This article investigates the effect of CO2 tax level on recovery process of already producing fields with waterflooding. Our methodology is waterflooding optimization in reservoir simulation models, specifically optimizing well-controls. Unlike traditional studies, our optimization objective comprises two components: the profitability of hydrocarbon production and an additional tax proportional to CO2 emissions. The associated CO2 emissions is estimated using a scheme developed upon an integrated model of reservoir, surface network, and topside facility. We examine our methodology on two cases with heterogeneous reservoir models. In each case, we optimize multi-scenarios enforcing different CO2 tax rates. The solutions indicate that imposing a higher CO2 tax rate reduces both emissions and hydrocarbon production. The fractional reduction of oil produced is however smaller than the emission reduction. While an increased tax rate drives the topside equipment to operate at higher efficiencies, the main effects of a higher tax rate are reduced water injection and more efficient subsurface drainage. There is a non-linear relationship between the reduced production and emissions. For increasing tax levels there are diminishing returns on lower emissions, reflecting reduced opportunities for emission reduction by changes in the drainage strategy. Some increments on the tax rate will therefore have negligible impacts on the optimal drainage strategy, and hence an adverse effect on the profitability with negligible emission reduction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectParticle swarm optimizationen_US
dc.subjectEffect of CO2 tax rateen_US
dc.subjectReduction of carbon emissionsen_US
dc.subjectAugmented objective functionen_US
dc.subjectWell-control optimizationen_US
dc.subjectEnergy-effcient water injectionen_US
dc.titleEffect of CO2 tax on energy use in oil production: waterflooding optimization under different emission costsen_US
dc.title.alternativeEffect of CO2 tax on energy use in oil production: waterflooding optimization under different emission costsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
dc.source.pagenumber26en_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.journalSN Applied Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42452-022-05197-4
dc.identifier.cristin2074343
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 296207en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal