Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Hallvard Fjøsne
dc.contributor.authorMajeed, Hammad
dc.contributor.authorKnuutila, Hanna K
dc.contributor.authorHillestad, Magne
dc.contributor.authorEvjen, Sigvart
dc.contributor.authorMejdell, T.
dc.contributor.authorEinbu, A.
dc.contributor.authorHjarbo, Kai Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, G.
dc.contributor.authorHoff, K.A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-12T08:12:25Z
dc.date.available2022-09-12T08:12:25Z
dc.date.created2021-09-06T12:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2021, 109 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3017116
dc.description.abstractA new and improved aerosol model has been developed and tested against experimental data. An e-NRTL equilibrium model for MEA was extended to cover sulphuric acid containing droplets and validated against new eboulliometer data in this work. The droplet model predicts emissions without demister installed in the absorber, within ± 20% and with demister, 30-80% of the measured emissions. The model predicts well the change in emissions from NG-based to coal-based exhaust. Under conditions reported in this work, the droplet number concentration was found to have a small effect on predicted emissions because of more MEA gas-phase depletion with high droplet concentrations and slower growth. The effects counteract each other. With significant MEA depletion in the gas phase, the emissions are largely determined by the mass transfer rate from the bulk liquid. The initial droplet sulphuric acid concentration had a minor effect on the outlet droplet size distribution. The effect on MEA emissions was significant: the emissions went up with increased initial sulphuric acid concentration. The effect of sulphuric acid was stronger for low inlet gas CO2 concentration (NG) than for coal-based exhaust. The increase in emissions is believed to be caused by the increase in overall driving force for MEA between bulk liquid phase and droplets. The log-normal model does not catch small inlet droplet sizes in the range below 20-30nm. These droplet sizes hardly grow in the absorber and water wash and in the total emissions, these droplets have a negligible impact on emissions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectaerosol emissionsen_US
dc.subjectdroplet size distributionen_US
dc.subjectaerosol growthen_US
dc.subjectMonoethanolamineen_US
dc.subjectabsorptionen_US
dc.subjectCO2 captureen_US
dc.titleAerosol growth in CO2 absorption with MEA, modelling and comparison with experimental resultsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume109en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103390
dc.identifier.cristin1931602
dc.source.articlenumber103390en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal