Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrozovsky, Johannes Georg
dc.contributor.authorRadivojevic, Janja
dc.contributor.authorSimonsen, Are Johan
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-16T13:50:55Z
dc.date.available2022-06-16T13:50:55Z
dc.date.created2022-06-08T10:08:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Building Engineering. 2022, 55, 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-7102
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2999094
dc.description.abstractTo quantify the effect of different compositions of the urban surface on the urban microclimate, building energy demand, and summerly overheating of a selected 13-floor office high-rise building in Trondheim, Norway, a validated Computational Fluid Dynamics model is coupled with Building Performance Simulation. In total, four scenarios were investigated in three one-week periods in summer (15.06.20–21.06.20), autumn (16.09.20–22.09.20), and winter (21.12.20–27.12.20). The scenarios were: (1) base case or current situation; (2) no vegetation in the entire domain with no trees and grass surfaces being substituted with concrete; (3) all vegetation with all concrete, asphalt, and pavements replaced by grass; and (4) the base case situation with highly improved insulation levels of surrounding buildings. The results demonstrate clear benefits from urban greening during a one-week heat wave as the no vegetation scenario increased the cooling energy demand by 28.5%. The positive effect of evapotranspiration from grass surfaces was noticeable especially on the lowest two floors, where cooling energy demands were halved. During the simulated weeks in autumn and winter, the no vegetation scenario resulted in respectively 3.5% and 0.9% lower heating energy demands. At the investigated building, improving the insulation properties of all modeled surrounding buildings led to 0.1 °C higher average air temperatures during summer, and 0.1 °C lower during winter, while they remained unchanged in autumn. However, the energy demands were 0.8%, 0.9%, and 0.8% higher compared to the base case for summer, autumn, and winter, respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710222006945?via%3Dihub
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMaterialsen_US
dc.subjectUrban physicsen_US
dc.subjectCold climateen_US
dc.subjectBuilding performance simulationen_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectUrban microclimateen_US
dc.titleAssessing the impact of urban microclimate on building energy demand by coupling CFD and building performance simulationen_US
dc.title.alternativeAssessing the impact of urban microclimate on building energy demand by coupling CFD and building performance simulationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber24en_US
dc.source.volume55en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Building Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104681
dc.identifier.cristin2030133
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257660en_US
dc.source.articlenumber104681en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal