Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBjørnarå, T.I.
dc.contributor.authorHaines, E.M.
dc.contributor.authorSkurtveit, E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T09:29:40Z
dc.date.available2021-09-30T09:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1714-5
dc.identifier.issn2387-4295
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2786524
dc.description.abstractEvery CCS project has an inherent risk of leakage. Faults are difficult to characterize because they are structurally complex and limited subsurface field-data is typically available; hence the properties need to be inferred elsewhere, e.g. well-logs and seismic. For example, the shale gouge ratio (SGR) is typically used today in the oil and gas exploration to estimate sealing properties of faults, by utilizing VShale well logs. Here we extend the methodology to account for along-fault flow where the complex structural composition of a fault is conceptually described by a geocellular model that is stochastically constructed using modelled SGR from a real fault (Vette Fault) in the Horda platform, North Sea, offshore Norway. A detailed geocellular fault model can be extremely computationally expensive, therefore an upscaled formulation is defined and validated. This formulation also extends the applicability of a multi-layered geocellular model by allowing slip-surface(s) to be a natural component of the fault core. The validation model is applied to a single-phase fluid flow problem, simulating fluid migration from a pressurized reservoir and across and up along a fault that intersects the reservoir; a scenario directly relevant to CO2 storage where the fault is (temporary) outside the reach of the injected CO2 plume. The presented upscaled formulation of a multi-layered geocellular model was found to have a high and consistent accuracy, relative to a full-dimensional reference model, with generally less than 4 % error (or less than 8 % within 95 % confidence interval) in calculated along- and across-fault flow. The focus here is on proof of concept and validation of a generic upscaled multi-layered geocellular model, but some general observations can be made. For across-fault flow, an increase in variability in fault composition resulted in a reduced flow-rate and less spread in flow-rate. For along-fault flow, increasing variability in fault composition had little effect on mean flow-rate, but resulted in smaller spread.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTCCS–11. CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage. Trondheim 22nd–23rd June 2021. Short Papers from the 11th International Trondheim CCS Conference
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSINTEF Proceedings;7
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCO2 Storageen_US
dc.subjectAcross- And Along-Fault Flowen_US
dc.subjectShale Gouge Ratio (SGR)en_US
dc.subjectFault Leakageen_US
dc.titleUpscaled Geocellular Flow Model of Potential Across-and along-Fault Leakage Using Shale Gouge Ratioen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeConference objecten_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Published by SINTEF Academic Press.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0