Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRoussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.authorBerghout, Niels
dc.contributor.authorFout, Tim
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Monica
dc.contributor.authorGardarsdottir, Stefania Osk
dc.contributor.authorNazir, Shareq Mohd
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorRubin, Edward S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T12:03:43Z
dc.date.available2021-03-17T12:03:43Z
dc.date.created2021-01-08T11:37:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2733895
dc.description.abstractThis paper contributes to the development of improved guidelines for cost evaluation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) from industrial applications building on previous work in the field. It discusses key challenges and factors that have a large impact on the results of cost evaluations, but are often overlooked or insufficiently addressed. These include cost metrics (especially in the context of industrial plants with multiple output products), energy supply aspects, retrofitting costs, CO2 transport and storage, maturity of the capture technology. Where possible examples are given to demonstrate their quantitative impact and show how costs may vary widely on a case-by-case basis. Recommendations are given to consider different possible heat and power supply strategies, as well as future energy and carbon price scenarios, to better understand cost performances under various framework conditions. Since retrofitting CCS is very relevant for industrial facilities, further considerations are made on how to better account for the key elements that constitute retrofitting costs. Furthermore, instead of using a fixed unit cost for CO2 transport and storage, cost estimates should at least consider the flowrate, transport mode, transport distance and type of storage, to make more realistic cost estimates. Recommendations are also given on factors to consider when assessing the technological maturity level of CCS in various industrial applications, which is important when assessing cost contingencies and cost uncertainties. Lastly, we urge techno-economic analysis practitioners to clearly report all major assumptions and methods, as well as ideally examine the impact of these on their estimates.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTowards improved cost evaluation of Carbon Capture and Storage from industryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe Authorsen_US
dc.source.volume106en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103263
dc.identifier.cristin1867639
dc.source.articlenumber103263en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal