Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPutta, Koteswara Rao
dc.contributor.authorTobiesen, Finn Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Hallvard Fjøsne
dc.contributor.authorKnuutila, Hanna K
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-23T09:19:42Z
dc.date.available2020-12-23T09:19:42Z
dc.date.created2017-10-26T12:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationApplied Energy. 2017, 206 765-783.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2720880
dc.description.abstractIn many chemical industrial processes, mass transfer across gas-liquid interfaces accompanied by chemical reaction is the governing phenomena. In case of mass transfer accompanied by a chemical reaction in the liquid phase, the reaction will enhance mass transfer and generally the mass transfer enhancement is quantified in terms of an enhancement factor. Large number of enhancement factor models have been developed in literature and used without critical analysis for analyzing pilot data for CO2 absorption into aqueous amines. In order to perform such a critical analysis, 24 models are tested using lab-scale experimental data from four independent apparatuses for CO2 absorption into MEA solutions covering a range of different conditions such as short and long contact times, with and without gas phase resistance, high and low CO2 loadings and temperatures. Of the 24 enhancement factor models tested only six models were found to satisfactorily predict the experimental CO2 fluxes. These were the models based on the simple pseudo-first order reaction assumption, Emodels 1, 2 and 3 by Hatta [2] and Dankwerts [4] respectively, Emodel 20, the deCoursey and Thring [44] model based on Danckwert’s surface renewal theory with unequal diffusivities, Emodel 24, the recently published generalized model by Gaspar and Fosbøl [51] and Emodel 21, the Tufano et al. [67] model based surface renewal theory. All these models were found to work equally well to the discretized penetration model. No significant difference was found between Emodels 1, 2 and 3, indicating that whether one uses as basis a film, penetration or surface renewal model, is of insignificant importance. The success of the simple models is attributed to the short contact times in the experiments used as basis and the accuracy of the kinetic model. Contact times of the same magnitude between mixing points is also encountered in industrial packings and it is believed that the simple enhancement factor models may work well also in these cases if an accurate kinetic model is used.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAqueous alkanolaminesen_US
dc.subjectCO2 absorptionen_US
dc.subjectChemical reactionen_US
dc.subjectMass transferen_US
dc.subjectEnhancement factor modelen_US
dc.titleApplicability of enhancement factor models for CO2 absorption into aqueous MEA solutionsen_US
dc.title.alternativeApplicability of enhancement factor models for CO2 absorption into aqueous MEA solutionsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThis is a submitted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier Ltd in Applied Energy, 8 September 2017.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber765-783en_US
dc.source.volume206en_US
dc.source.journalApplied Energyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.173
dc.identifier.cristin1507982
cristin.unitcode7401,80,0,0
cristin.unitnameSINTEF Materialer og kjemi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel