Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMejdell, Thor
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Geir
dc.contributor.authorRieder, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorKvamsdal, Hanne Marie
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T13:35:50Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T13:35:50Z
dc.date.created2018-01-29T11:05:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Procedia. 2017, 114 1231-1244.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2720817
dc.description.abstractThe present work is based on an MEA absorption test campaign performed November 2013–January 2014 at EnBW's amine test pilot located in Heilbronn, Germany. The test campaign included transient step responses in steam, exhaust gas, solvent flow rate and in exhaust gas CO2 concentration. In addition, a test with simultaneous steps in all flow rates (exhaust gas, solvent and steam) was included. A dynamic model of the Heilbronn plant was then implemented in the dynamic simulator K-Spice® and tested against the step responses at the plant. In spite of some stead state deviations, the model was able to capture the process dynamics very well. For dynamic studies one can therefore assume that the model is representative for the plant. In the work presented here, two different control configurations were tested: 1) Ratio control in combination with a slow feed back control on the CO2 out of the absorber and 2) Control of CO2 out of the absorber by lean liquid flow rate and a temperature sensor up in the desorber packing. Both structures involve only simple PID control loops and are thus easy to implement. The proposed control configurations were tested by simulations with 30% changes in flue gas flow and composition. Both configurations showed good performance during the simulation testing, but the second one was superior as well as excellent with respect to tight CO2 recovery control. This may be an important property in supervisory control schemes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMEAen_US
dc.subjectPlantwide controlen_US
dc.subjectDynamic process modellingen_US
dc.subjectPilot planten_US
dc.subjectCO2 captureen_US
dc.titleDynamic and Control of an Absorber - Desorber Plant at Heilbronnen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of GHGT-13. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1378en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1231-1244en_US
dc.source.volume114en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Procediaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1378
dc.identifier.cristin1554219
cristin.unitcode7401,80,3,4
cristin.unitnameCO2 innfangningsprosesser
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal