Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKvamsdal, Hanne Marie
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Geir
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jock
dc.contributor.authorWolbers, Patrick F.
dc.contributor.authorDrew, Richsrd J.
dc.contributor.authorKhakharia, Purvil
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Juliana Garcia Moretz-Sohn
dc.contributor.authorGoetheer, Earl L.V.
dc.contributor.authorMiddelkamp, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKanniche, Mohamed S.
dc.contributor.authorSirvent, Antoni Julià
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T13:35:31Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T13:35:31Z
dc.date.created2018-02-14T18:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Procedia. 2017, 114 2642-2657.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2720814
dc.description.abstractHiPerCap aims to develop high-potential novel and environmentally benign technologies and processes for post-combustion CO2 capture leading to real breakthroughs. The project includes all the main separation categories for post-combustion CO2 capture, absorption, adsorption and membranes. Each technology category is focused on several promising concepts and a key focus in the project is to demonstrate the potential of these various capture technologies. A methodology has been developed for assessment and fair comparison of the various technologies and benchmarking against a state-of-the art capture technology demonstrated in the CESAR project. In the present paper, this methodology is demonstrated for two of the absorption-based concepts involving precipitating solvent systems. Here, the assessment is based on energy efficiency penalty for the total integrated power plant and capture plant process. Though there is a slight improvement compared to the reference plant (0.5 and 7%, respectively) neither of the two precipitating solvent systems assessed here meet the project target of 25% improvement. However, the uncertainty level in the numbers is higher for these two systems compared to the reference case and the models used for the capture process should be improved before a conclusion can be made. The HiPerCap project is just starting the assessment phase and it must be emphasized that additional assessment criteria will be used and other types of technologies will be assessed before completion at the end of 2017.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectbenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectprecipitating solventsen_US
dc.subjectabsorptionen_US
dc.subjectpost-combustionen_US
dc.titleReference case and test case for benchmarking of HiPerCap technologiesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of GHGT-13. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1448en_US
dc.source.pagenumber2642-2657en_US
dc.source.volume114en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Procediaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1448
dc.identifier.cristin1565305
cristin.unitcode7401,80,3,4
cristin.unitnameCO2 innfangningsprosesser
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal