Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThorne, Rebecca Jayne
dc.contributor.authorBouman, Evert
dc.contributor.authorSundseth, Kyrre
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, Maria Asuncion Aranda
dc.contributor.authorCzakiert, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorPacyna, Jozef M
dc.contributor.authorPacyna, Elisabeth G
dc.contributor.authorKrauz, Mariusz
dc.contributor.authorCelińska, Agnieszka
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-26T09:38:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-26T09:38:46Z
dc.date.created2019-05-15T11:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2019, 86 101-111.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2689707
dc.description.abstractChemical Looping Combustion (CLC) is a promising CO2 capture option since it inherently separates CO2 from other flue components, theoretically with low energy penalty. Here, a Life Cycle Assessment model was developed of a theoretical hybrid CLC (HCLC) power plant facility utilising experimental data for CuO based oxygen carrier (OC) production and oxygen capacity. Power plant models with and without post-combustion CO2 capture, recognised as the most mature capture technology, acted as environmental performance targets. Results show that when OC is produced at lab-scale without optimisation, almost all (>99.9%) lifecycle impacts per kWh electricity from an HCLC plant derive from the specific OC material used, giving a total of ˜700 kg CO2eq/kWh. This is related to high electrical input required for OC processing, as well as high OC losses during production and from plant waste. Only when processing parameters are optimised and OC recycling from plant waste is implemented - reducing fresh OC needs – is the environmental impact lower than the conventional technologies studied (e.g. 0.2 kg CO2 eq/kWh vs. ˜0.3-1 kg CO2 eq/kWh, respectively). Further research should thus focus on identifying OCs that do not require energy intensive processing and can endure repeated cycles, allowing for recycling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectEnvironmental impacten_US
dc.subjectTechnology developmenten_US
dc.subjectCarbon capture and storage (CCS)en_US
dc.subjectChemical looping combustion (CLC)en_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment (LCA)en_US
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of a chemical looping combustion power planten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber101-111en_US
dc.source.volume86en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.04.011
dc.identifier.cristin1698008
dc.relation.projectNILU - Norsk institutt for luftforskning: 114039en_US
cristin.unitcode7401,80,62,0
cristin.unitnameBærekraftig energiteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal