Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRohde, Tarald
dc.contributor.authorTorvatn, Hans Yngvar
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T13:40:53Z
dc.date.available2019-02-21T13:40:53Z
dc.date.created2017-04-21T15:31:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationHealth Policy. 2017, 121 (5), 525-533.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0168-8510
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2586812
dc.description.abstractIn 2007, the Norwegian Parliament decided to merge the two largest health regions in the country: the South and East Health Regions became the South-East Health Region (SEHR). In its resolution, the Parliament formulated strong expectations for the merger: these included more effective hospital services in the Oslo metropolitan area, freeing personnel to work in other parts of the country, and making treatment of patients more coherent. The Parliamentary resolution provided no specific instructions regarding how this should be achieved. In order to fulfil these expectations, the new health region decided to develop a strategy as its tool for change; a change “agent”. SINTEF was engaged to evaluate the process and its results. We studied the strategy design, the tools that emerged from the process, and which changes were induced by the strategy. The evaluation adopted a multimethod approach that combined interviews, document analysis and (re)analysis of existing data. The latter included economic data, performance data, and work environment data collected by the South-East Health Region itself. SINTEF found almost no effects, whether positive or negative. This article describes how the strategy was developed and discusses why it failed to meet the expectations formulated in the Parliamentary resolution.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA strategic document as a tool for implementing change. Lessons from the merger creating the South-East Health region in Norwaynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber525-533nb_NO
dc.source.volume121nb_NO
dc.source.journalHealth Policynb_NO
dc.source.issue5nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.02.014
dc.identifier.cristin1465990
cristin.unitcode7401,60,25,0
cristin.unitcode7401,60,55,0
cristin.unitnameHelse
cristin.unitnameTeknologiledelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal