Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBraun, Markus
dc.contributor.authorLamert, Markus
dc.contributor.authorOzarkar, Shailesh
dc.contributor.authorSanyal, Jay
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-08T07:08:39Z
dc.date.available2017-11-08T07:08:39Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1433-5
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1432-8
dc.identifier.issn2387-4295
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2464765
dc.description.abstractComparative assessment of Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange modelling approaches for gas-particle flows is performed by comparing their predictions against experimental data of two fluidization challenge problems put forth by National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Morgantown, WV, USA. The first fluidization challenge problem is based on a laboratory scale fluidized bed while the second fluidization challenge problem is based on a pilot scale circulating fluidized bed. It is found that both computational models predict comparable results and those results are in qualitative agreement with the experimental data.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Pressnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofSelected papers from 10th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Oil & Gas, Metallurgical and Process Industries
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSINTEF Proceedings;1
dc.subjectEuler-Eulernb_NO
dc.subjectEuler-Lagrangenb_NO
dc.subjectGas-Particle flowsnb_NO
dc.subjectFluidized bednb_NO
dc.titleComparing Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange based modelling approaches for gas-particle flowsnb_NO
dc.typeChapternb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2015 SINTEF Academic Pressnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel