Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDzofou Ngoumelah, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHeggeset, Tonje Marita Bjerkan
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Tone
dc.contributor.authorSulheim, Snorre
dc.contributor.authorWentzel, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorHarnisch, Falk
dc.contributor.authorKretzschmar, Jörg
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T09:46:28Z
dc.date.available2024-10-11T09:46:28Z
dc.date.created2024-04-08T09:10:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationnpj Biofilms and Microbiomes. 2024, 10 (1): 17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-5008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3157791
dc.description.abstractCombining anaerobic digestion (AD) and microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) in AD-MET holds great potential. Methanogens have been identified as one cause of decreased electrochemical activity and deterioration of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes. A better understanding of the different interactions between methanogenic genera/species and Geobacter spp. biofilms is needed to shed light on the observed reduction in electrochemical activity and stability of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilms as well as observed changes in microbial communities of AD-MET. Here, we have analyzed electrochemical parameters and changes in the microbial community of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes when exposed to three representative methanogens with different metabolic pathways, i.e., Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanobacterium formicicum, and Methanothrix soehngenii. M. barkeri negatively affected the performance and stability of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes only in the initial batches. In contrast, M. formicicum did not affect the stability of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes but caused a decrease in maximum current density of ~37%. M. soehngenii induced a coloration change of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes and a decrease in the total transferred charge by ~40%. Characterization of biofilm samples after each experiment by 16S rRNA metabarcoding, whole metagenome nanopore sequencing, and shotgun sequencing showed a higher relative abundance of Geobacter spp. after exposure to M. barkeri as opposed to M. formicicum or M. soehngenii, despite the massive biofilm dispersal observed during initial exposure to M. barkeri.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEffect of model methanogens on the electrochemical activity, stability, and microbial community structure of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilm anodesen_US
dc.title.alternativeEffect of model methanogens on the electrochemical activity, stability, and microbial community structure of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilm anodesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Springer Nature.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalnpj Biofilms and Microbiomesen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41522-024-00490-z
dc.identifier.cristin2259693
dc.source.articlenumber17en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal