Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDanielsen, Brit-Eli
dc.contributor.authorLützhöft, Margareta
dc.contributor.authorHaavik, Torgeir Kolstø
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Stig Ole
dc.contributor.authorPorathe, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T14:38:47Z
dc.date.available2022-09-21T14:38:47Z
dc.date.created2022-07-28T12:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCognition, Technology & Work. 2022.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1435-5558
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3020270
dc.description.abstractNavigating a ship is a complex task that requires close interaction between navigators and technology available on the ship’s bridge. The quality of this interaction depends on human and organisational factors, but also on technological design. This is recognized by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) through the SOLAS V/15 regulation that requires human factor considerations in bridge design. The objective of this paper is to investigate how tensions between the main stakeholders’ interests and perspectives in ship bridge design may influence the achievement of the goals set forth in the SOLAS V/15 regulation. This objective is explored through a qualitative study in the maritime industry, involving seafarers, shipowners, and equipment manufacturers. We find suboptimal ship bridge design usability to be connected to structural characteristics of the maritime sector, where different aims and perspectives between core stakeholders impairs alignment with respect to conception of work-as-done in the operative environment. We also find that profitability is a major driver for the blunt end stakeholders, for whom the relation between usability and profitability is perceived as a trade-off rather than of synergy. We conclude that there is a need to develop processes, enablers, and management tools to (1) update the understanding of the professional competence needed in the technology dense work environment on ship bridges today; (2) strengthen the maritime stakeholders’ awareness of the advantages of human-centred design (HCD) which are both operator well-being and system performance; (3) enable implementation of HCD into existing design and development processes; (4) provide metrics for business cases enabling informed ergonomic investment decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectShip bridge designen_US
dc.subjectHuman-centred designen_US
dc.subjectUsabilityen_US
dc.subjectMaritime human factorsen_US
dc.subjectHuman-technology interactionen_US
dc.subjectWork-as-imagined/work-as-doneen_US
dc.title“Seafarers should be navigating by the stars”: barriers to usability in ship bridge designen_US
dc.title.alternative“Seafarers should be navigating by the stars”: barriers to usability in ship bridge designen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
dc.source.journalCognition, Technology & Worken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10111-022-00700-8
dc.identifier.cristin2039934
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 267509en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/814975en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal