dc.contributor.author | Lagemann, Benjamin | |
dc.contributor.author | Lindstad, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Fagerholt, Kjetil | |
dc.contributor.author | Rialland, Agathe Isabelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Erikstad, Stein Ove | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-10T07:49:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-10T07:49:14Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-11-30T16:44:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2021, 102 . | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1361-9209 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3010990 | |
dc.description.abstract | Alternative fuels and fuel-flexible ships are often seen as promising solutions for achieving significant greenhouse gas reductions in shipping. We formulate the selection of alternative fuels and corresponding ship power systems as a bi-objective integer optimization problem. We apply our model to a Supramax Dry-bulker and solve it for a lower bound price scenario including a carbon tax. Within this setting, the question whether bio-fuels will be available to shipping has significant effect on the lifetime costs. For the given scenario and case study ship, our model identifies LNG as a robust power system choice today for a broad range of GHG reduction ambitions. For high GHG reduction ambitions, a retrofit to ammonia, produced from renewable electricity, appears to be the most cost-effective option. While these findings are case-specific, the model may be applied to a broad range of cargo ships. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Retrofit | en_US |
dc.subject | Flexibility | en_US |
dc.subject | Optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | Multi-objective | en_US |
dc.subject | Alternative fuels | en_US |
dc.subject | GHG | en_US |
dc.subject | Shipping | en_US |
dc.title | Optimal ship lifetime fuel and power system selection | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 12 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 102 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103145 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1962020 | |
dc.source.articlenumber | 103145 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |