Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorArnaiz del Pozo, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCloete, Schalk Willem Petrus
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-08T08:56:34Z
dc.date.available2022-08-08T08:56:34Z
dc.date.created2022-05-19T12:21:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Conversion and Management. 2022, 255 1-17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3010564
dc.description.abstractAmmonia is an industrial chemical and the basic building block for the fertilizer industry. Lately, attention has shifted towards using ammonia as a carbon-free energy vector, due to the ease of transportation and storage in liquid state at −33 °C and atmospheric pressure. This study evaluates the prospects of blue and green ammonia as future energy carriers; specifically, the gas switching reforming (GSR) concept for H2 and N2 co-production from natural gas with inherent CO2 capture (blue), and H2 generation through an optimized value chain of wind and solar power, electrolysers, cryogenic N2 supply, and various options for energy storage (green). These longer-term concepts are benchmarked against conventional technologies integrating CO2 capture: the Kellogg Braun & Root (KBR) Purifier process and the Linde Ammonia Concept (LAC). All modelled plants utilize the same ammonia synthesis loop for a consistent comparison. A cash flow analysis showed that the GSR concept achieved an attractive levelized cost of ammonia (LCOA) of 332.1 €/ton relative to 385.1–385.9 €/ton for the conventional plants at European energy prices (6.5 €/GJ natural gas and 60 €/MWh electricity). Optimal technology integration for green ammonia using technology costs representative of 2050 was considerably more expensive: 484.7–772.1 €/ton when varying the location from Saudi Arabia to Germany. Furthermore, the LCOA of the GSR technology drops to 192.7 €/ton when benefitting from low Saudi Arabian energy costs (2 €/GJ natural gas and 40 €/MWh electricity). This cost difference between green and blue ammonia remained robust in sensitivity analyses, where input energy cost (natural gas or wind/solar power) was the most influential parameter. Given its low production costs and the techno-economic feasibility of international ammonia trade, advanced blue ammonia production from GSR offers an attractive pathway for natural gas exporting regions to contribute to global decarbonization.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectEnergy carrieren_US
dc.subjectHydrogenen_US
dc.subjectTechno-economic assessmenten_US
dc.subjectCO2 capture and storageen_US
dc.subjectAmmoniaen_US
dc.titleTechno-economic assessment of blue and green ammonia as energy carriers in a low-carbon futureen_US
dc.title.alternativeTechno-economic assessment of blue and green ammonia as energy carriers in a low-carbon futureen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-17en_US
dc.source.volume255en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Conversion and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115312
dc.identifier.cristin2025581
dc.source.articlenumber115312en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal