Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDhoke, Chaitanya
dc.contributor.authorZaabout, Abdelghafour
dc.contributor.authorCloete, Schalk Willem Petrus
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Shahriar
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T07:58:24Z
dc.date.available2021-11-15T07:58:24Z
dc.date.created2021-04-20T10:34:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2021, 60 3779-3798.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-5885
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2829498
dc.description.abstractAdsorption-based CO2 capture has enjoyed considerable research attention in recent years. Most of the research efforts focused on sorbent development to reduce the energy penalty. However, the use of suitable gas–solid contacting systems is key for extracting the full potential from the sorbent to minimize operating and capital costs and accelerate the commercial deployment of the technology. This paper reviews several reactor configurations that were proposed for adsorption-based CO2 capture. The fundamental behavior of adsorption in different gas–solid contactors (fixed, fluidized, moving, or rotating beds) and regeneration under different modes (pressure, temperature, or combined swings) is discussed, highlighting the strengths and limitations of different combinations of gas–solid contactor and regeneration mode. In addition, the estimated energy duties in published studies and current technology readiness level of the different reactor configurations are reported. Other aspects, such as the reactor footprint, the operation strategy, suitability to retrofits, and the ability to operate under flexible loads are also discussed. In terms of future work, the key research need is a standardized techno-economic benchmarking study to calculate CO2 avoidance costs for different adsorption technologies under standardized assumptions. Qualitatively, each technology presents several strengths and weaknesses that make it impossible to identify a clear optimal solution. Such a standardized quantitative comparison is therefore needed to focus on future technology development efforts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherACS Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectRegenerationen_US
dc.subjectHeat transferen_US
dc.subjectAdsorptionen_US
dc.subjectSorbentsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental pollutionen_US
dc.titleReview on reactor configurations for adsorption-based CO2 captureen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder©2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Societyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber3779-3798en_US
dc.source.volume60en_US
dc.source.journalIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Researchen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04547
dc.identifier.cristin1905234
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal