Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBecattini, Viola
dc.contributor.authorGabrielli, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorMazzotti, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T08:25:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T08:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1714-5
dc.identifier.issn2387-4295
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2785911
dc.description.abstractThis contribution presents a techno-economic analysis of feasible pathways for the aviation industry to achieve netzero CO2 emissions. These pathways are based (i) on carbon capture and storage (CCS), where conventional fossil jet fuel is produced and the corresponding emissions are offset by capturing CO2, either via direct air capture (DAC-CCS route) or via point-source capture (PSC-CCS route), and permanently storing it underground; and (ii) on carbon capture and utilization (CCU), where synthetic jet fuel is produced by using CO2 as feedstock, which is either captured from air (DAC-CCU route) or from a point-source emitter (PSC-CCU route). To ensure net-zero CO2 emissions, the feedstock of the point-source emitter, both for CCS- and CCU-based routes, must be of biogenic nature. A comparative quantitative assessment of these scenarios and of a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, where aviation emissions are subjected to a carbon tax, is performed based on jet fuel cost and carbon price projections until 2050. Cost reductions due to economy of scale of current low-maturity technologies are accounted for. An uncertainty analysis based on Monte Carlo simulations is performed to assess the effects of the uncertainty associated with the most relevant technoeconomic quantities on the observed trends. Findings show that CCS-based scenarios consistently lead to lower jet fuel costs than CCU-based scenarios across the considered time scenarios and sensitivity analyses. This is mainly due to the fact that CCU-based routes result in an energy consumption more than 20 times higher than CCS-based routes, which also implies higher CO2 emissions when considering the carbon intensity of current electricity grids. Overall, the PSC-CCS route represents the most cost-effective solution for decarbonizing the aviation industry and it is costcompetitive with BAU already today.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTCCS–11. CO2 Capture, Transport and Storage. Trondheim 22nd–23rd June 2021. Short Papers from the 11th International Trondheim CCS Conference
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSINTEF Proceedings;7
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAviationen_US
dc.subjectNet-zero emissionsen_US
dc.subjectCarbon capture and storageen_US
dc.subjectCarbon utilizationen_US
dc.subjectRenewable fuelsen_US
dc.titleThe Role of Carbon Capture, Storage and Utilization to Enable a Net-Zero-Co2-Emissions Aviation Sectoren_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Published by SINTEF Academic Press.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som CC BY 4.0