Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCloete, Schalk Willem Petrus
dc.contributor.authorZaabout, Abdelghafour
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Stein Tore
dc.contributor.authorAnnaland, MV
dc.contributor.authorGallucci, F
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Shahriar
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T11:10:25Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T11:10:25Z
dc.date.created2013-05-21T12:40:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationPowder Technology. 2013, 235 735-746.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-5910
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2719119
dc.description.abstractHydrodynamic simulations of a pseudo-2D bubbling fluidized bed were carried out and compared to experiments conducted over a wide range of flow conditions. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the generality of the standard 2D Two Fluid Model (TFM) closed by the Kinetic Theory of Granular Flows (KTGF) which is regularly used in the literature to simulate bubbling fluidized beds. Comparisons of the bed expansion ratio over wide ranges of fluidization velocity, bed loading and particle size showed systematic differences between simulations and experiments, indicating that the generality of this modelling approach is questionable. More detailed flow velocity measurements collected via Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) showed that the model greatly over-predicts flow velocities in the bed. Subsequent 3D simulations showed this over-prediction to be the result of 2D simulations neglecting the wall friction at the front and back walls of the pseudo-2D bed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectKinetic theory of granular flowsen_US
dc.subjectTwo fluid modelen_US
dc.subjectExperimental validationen_US
dc.subjectFluidized beden_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.titleThe generality of the standard 2D TFM approach in predicting bubbling fluidized bed hydrodynamicsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2012. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.source.pagenumber735-746en_US
dc.source.volume235en_US
dc.source.journalPowder Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.powtec.2012.11.041
dc.identifier.cristin1029411
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 197580en_US
cristin.unitcode7401,80,5,2
cristin.unitnameStrømningsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal