Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAlcorn, Zachary Paul
dc.contributor.authorFredriksen, Sunniva
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Mohan
dc.contributor.authorFøyen, Tore Lyngås
dc.contributor.authorWergeland, Connie
dc.contributor.authorFernø, Martin
dc.contributor.authorGraue, Arne
dc.contributor.authorErsland, Geir
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-12T08:38:44Z
dc.date.available2020-06-12T08:38:44Z
dc.date.created2019-12-11T14:05:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationE3S Web of Conferences. 2020, 146 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2267-1242
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2657845
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents experimental and numerical sensitivity studies to assist injection strategy design for an ongoing CO2 foam field pilot. The aim is to increase the success of in-situ CO2 foam generation and propagation into the reservoir for CO2 mobility control, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and CO2 storage. Un-steady state in-situ CO2 foam behavior, representative of the near wellbore region, and steady-state foam behavior was evaluated. Multi-cycle surfactant-alternating gas (SAG) provided the highest apparent viscosity foam of 120.2 cP, compared to co-injection (56.0 cP) and single-cycle SAG (18.2 cP) in 100% brine saturated porous media. CO2 foam EOR corefloods at first-contact miscible (FCM) conditions showed that multi-cycle SAG generated the highest apparent foam viscosity in the presence of refined oil (n-Decane). Multi-cycle SAG demonstrated high viscous displacement forces critical in field implementation where gravity effects and reservoir heterogeneities dominate. At multiple-contact miscible (MCM) conditions, no foam was generated with either injection strategy as a result of wettability alteration and foam destabilization in presence of crude oil. In both FCM and MCM corefloods, incremental oil recoveries were on average 30.6% OOIP regardless of injection strategy for CO2 foam and base cases (i.e. no surfactant). CO2 diffusion and miscibility dominated oil recovery at the core-scale resulting in high microscopic CO2 displacement. CO2 storage potential was 9.0% greater for multi-cycle SAGs compared to co-injections at MCM. A validated core-scale simulation model was used for a sensitivity analysis of grid resolution and foam quality. The model was robust in representing the observed foam behavior and will be extended to use in field scale simulations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEDP Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectInjection strategiesen_US
dc.subjectCO2 storageen_US
dc.titleCore-scale sensitivity study of CO2 foam injection strategies for mobility control, enhanced oil recovery, and CO2 storageen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume146en_US
dc.source.journalE3S Web of Conferencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/e3sconf/202014602002
dc.identifier.cristin1759352
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 249742en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal