Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKnudsen, Jørgen Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorWold, Line Camilla
dc.contributor.authorAas, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorHaug, Jens Jacob Kielland
dc.contributor.authorBatel, Susanna
dc.contributor.authorDevine-Wright, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorQvenild, Marte
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Gerd Blindheim
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T12:12:56Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T12:12:56Z
dc.date.created2015-05-05T15:37:05Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy. 2015, 48 299-308.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2653063
dc.description.abstractTransmission lines are critical infrastructures, but frequently contested especially at the local level, bylocal communities. The role of public engagement in processes pertaining to specific transmission lineprojects is an under-researched, yet important topic that this paper seeks to discuss by investigating howinhabitants perceive these processes and to what extent they find the processes just and fair. This paperaddresses the participatory aspects of the planning process, as perceived by the local inhabitants in fourNorway and UK cases, by using a qualitative comparative case study design. We further analyse this issuethrough frameworks of public engagement and procedural justice. In both countries public engagement islargely characterized by perceptions of insufficient information, and insufficient influence on the process.In sum, the findings indicate that the informants generally perceive the opportunities for involvementas insufficient and unjust. The findings are quite similar across all cases and both countries. Local inhab-itants represent diverse groups who often have different levels of knowledge, time and engagement tobring to the planning process. Their requests for improved processes thus underline the serious publicengagement challenges that applicants and decision-makers face. Sustainable grid development Involvement Public engagement Communication Consultation Participation Procedural justice © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectSustainable grid developmenten_US
dc.subjectInvolvementen_US
dc.subjectPublic engagementen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectConsultationen_US
dc.subjectParticipationen_US
dc.subjectProcedural justiceen_US
dc.titleLocal perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UKen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsgeografi: 290en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Human geography: 290en_US
dc.source.pagenumber299-308en_US
dc.source.volume48en_US
dc.source.journalLand Use Policyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.031
dc.identifier.cristin1240654
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 207774en_US
cristin.unitcode7548,70,0,0
cristin.unitnameTermisk energi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal