Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysis
dc.contributor.author | Gardarsdottir, Stefania Osk | |
dc.contributor.author | de Lena, Edoardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Romano, Matteo | |
dc.contributor.author | Roussanaly, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Voldsund, Mari | |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez-Calvo, José-Francisco | |
dc.contributor.author | Berstad, David Olsson | |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Chao | |
dc.contributor.author | Anantharaman, Rahul | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutter, Daniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Gazzani, Matteo | |
dc.contributor.author | Mazzotti, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Cinti, Giovanni | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-12T17:10:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-12T17:10:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-02-11T11:00:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-1073 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585097 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations | nb_NO |
dc.description.abstract | Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | MDPI | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysis | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 12 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Energies | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 3 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/en12030542 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1675756 | |
dc.relation.project | EC/H2020/641185 | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 7548,60,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Gassteknologi | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 |
Tilhørende fil(er)
Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)
-
Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - SINTEF Energi [1596]
-
SINTEF Energi [1710]