Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGardarsdottir, Stefania Osk
dc.contributor.authorde Lena, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorRomano, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorRoussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.authorVoldsund, Mari
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Calvo, José-Francisco
dc.contributor.authorBerstad, David Olsson
dc.contributor.authorFu, Chao
dc.contributor.authorAnantharaman, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorSutter, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGazzani, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorMazzotti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorCinti, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T17:10:50Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T17:10:50Z
dc.date.created2019-02-11T11:00:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2585097
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 €/tCO2 (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 €/tCO2 (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 €/tCO2. Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerationsnb_NO
dc.description.abstractComparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysisnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherMDPInb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production — Part 2: Cost Analysisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume12nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergiesnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en12030542
dc.identifier.cristin1675756
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/641185nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7548,60,0,0
cristin.unitnameGassteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal