Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRoussanaly, Simon
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Jana Poplsteinova
dc.contributor.authorHognes, Erik Skontorp
dc.contributor.authorBrunsvold, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-06T13:08:56Z
dc.date.available2017-07-06T13:08:56Z
dc.date.created2013-08-05T15:35:51Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2013, 19 584-594.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2448096
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on illustrating the CCS chain methodology and the functionality of two transport assessment modules developed within the BIGCCS Research Centre for onshore pipeline and shipping between onshore areas. On the basis of these two modules, technical, costs and climate impact assessments of transport infrastructure and conditioning processes were assessed and compared for a base case. In this case study, onshore pipeline and CO2 shipping between two onshore harbours are compared for different distances and capacities. As expected, for a given annual capacity, onshore pipeline transport should be used for “short” distances, while shipping between harbours is employed for longer distances. Regarding the distance at which the cost-optimal technology switches between the two options, the results show that higher annual capacity and volume would lead to a preference for onshore pipeline transport. The base case can be used as a guide to draw conclusions on particular case studies under the hypotheses presented in this paper. The results also appear to be consistent with the few papers that have compared onshore pipeline and shipping between harbours. Sensitivity analyses were used to address and quantify the impact of several important parameters on the choice of technology. The influences of the individual parameters were then ranked showing that the four most influent parameters on the technology choice are the geographical context, the regional effect of pipeline costs, the First-Of-A-Kind effect, and the ownership effect. Additional work that focuses on transport between a coastal area and an offshore site using either an offshore pipeline or shipping will be presented in Part II of this paper. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBenchmarking of CO2 transport technologies: Part I—Onshore pipeline and shipping between two onshore areasnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holderAuthors have copyright to postprint versionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber584-594nb_NO
dc.source.volume19nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.031
dc.identifier.cristin1041662
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 193816nb_NO
cristin.unitcode7548,60,0,0
cristin.unitcode7569,83,0,0
cristin.unitnameGassteknologi
cristin.unitnameFiskeriteknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal