Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGargalis, Leonidas
dc.contributor.authorKaravias, Leonidas
dc.contributor.authorGraff, Joachim Seland
dc.contributor.authorDiplas, Spyridon
dc.contributor.authorKoumoulos, Elias P.
dc.contributor.authorKaraxi, Evangelia K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T11:13:05Z
dc.date.available2024-04-12T11:13:05Z
dc.date.created2023-12-08T10:55:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMetals. 2023, 13(11): 1897.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2075-4701
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126280
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper was to compare duplex (DSS) and super duplex stainless steel processed by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) based on the process parameters and microstructure–nanomechanical property relationships. Each alloy was investigated with respect to its feedstock powder characteristics. Optimum process parameters including scanning speed, laser power, beam diameter, laser energy density, and layer thickness were defined for each alloy, and near-fully dense parts (>99.9%) were produced. Microstructural analysis was performed via optical (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The samples were subjected to stress relief and high-temperature annealing. EBSD revealed the crystallographic orientation and quantified the phases in the as-built and annealed sample conditions. The as-built samples revealed a fully ferritic microstructure with a small amount of grain boundary austenite in the SDSS microstructure. High-temperature solution annealing resulted in the desired duplex microstructure for both alloys. There were no secondary phases present in the microstructure after both heat treatments. Nanoindentation generated nanomechanical (modulus) mapping grids and quantified the nanomechanical (both hardness and modulus) response; plasticity and stress relief were also assessed in all three conditions (as-built, stress-relieved, and annealed) in both DSS and SDSS. Austenite formation in the annealed condition contributed to lower hardness levels (~4.3–4.8 Gpa) and higher plastic deformation compared to the as-built (~5.7–6.3 Gpa) and stress-relieved conditions (~4.8–5.8 Gpa) for both alloys. SDSS featured a ~60% austenite volume fraction in its annealed and quenched microstructure, attributed to its higher nickel and nitrogen contents compared to DSS, which exhibited a ~30% austenite volume fraction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Comparative Investigation of Duplex and Super Duplex Stainless Steels Processed through Laser Powder Bed Fusionen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Comparative Investigation of Duplex and Super Duplex Stainless Steels Processed through Laser Powder Bed Fusionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 by the authors. Published by MDPI.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber30en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalMetalsen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/met13111897
dc.identifier.cristin2210901
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/952869en_US
dc.source.articlenumber1897en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal