Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLie, Knut-Andreas
dc.contributor.authorKrogstad, Stein
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-28T15:18:15Z
dc.date.available2023-02-28T15:18:15Z
dc.date.created2022-11-26T14:42:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2022, 221, 111266.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-4105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3054774
dc.description.abstractComputerized solutions for field management optimization often require reduced-order models to be computationally tractable. The purpose of this paper is to compare two different graph-based approaches for building such models. The first approach represents the reservoir as a graph of 1D numerical flow models that each connects an injector to a producer. One thus builds a network in which the topology is primarily determined by “well nodes” to which “non-well nodes” can be connected if need be. The second approach aims at building richer models so that the connectivity graph mimics the intercell connections in a conventional, coarse 3D grid model. One thus builds a network with topology defined by a mesh-like placement of “non-well nodes”, to which wells can be subsequently connected. The two approaches thus can be seen as graph-based analogues of traditional streamline and finite-volume simulation models. Both model types can be trained to match well responses obtained from underlying fine-scale simulations using standard misfit minimization methods; herein we rely on adjoint-based gradient optimization. Our comparisons show that graph models having a connectivity graph that mimics the intercell connectivity in coarse 3D models can represent a wider range of fluid connections and are generally more robust and easier to train than graph models built upon 1D subgridded interwell connections between injectors and producers only.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of two different types of reduced graph-based reservoir models: Interwell networks (GPSNet) versus aggregated coarse-grid networks (CGNet)en_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of two different types of reduced graph-based reservoir models: Interwell networks (GPSNet) versus aggregated coarse-grid networks (CGNet)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Author(s).en_US
dc.source.volume221en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111266
dc.identifier.cristin2081656
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 280950en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 308817en_US
dc.source.articlenumber111266en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal