Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMathisen, Kjell Magne
dc.contributor.authorBazilevs, Yuri
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Bjørn
dc.contributor.authorHelgedagsrud, Tore Andreas
dc.contributor.authorKvamsdal, Trond
dc.contributor.authorOkstad, Knut Morten
dc.contributor.authorRaknes, Siv Bente
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-07T07:08:22Z
dc.date.available2017-11-07T07:08:22Z
dc.date.created2017-10-17T08:30:26Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationMekIT’17 - Ninth national conference on Computational Mechanics, 245-272nb_NO
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-947311-1-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2464381
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofMekIT’17 - Ninth national conference on Computational Mechanics
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA comparative study of beam element formulations for nonlinear analysis: corotatinal vs. geometrically exact formulationsnb_NO
dc.typeChapternb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber245-272nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1505076
cristin.unitcode7401,90,11,0
cristin.unitnameAnvendt matematikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal